Ibegbu also stressed that
Ohanaeze, as a body, did not want the break-up of Nigeria, but a restructured
Nigeria.
The Deputy Publicity
Secretary of Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Mr Chuks Ibegbu, has said that the Northern
groups had no right to speak or decide for other Nigerians.
The Ohanaeze chieftain
stated, “One thing they (Northern groups) should know is that they are not
speaking for the Niger Delta; they are not speaking for the Middle Belt; they
are not speaking for the South-West, who have all spoken out to condemn the
ultimatum given to the Igbo to leave the North.
“They have no moral duty to
decide for other parts of the country.
They should be made to
understand that threats of separation started with the North. In 1950, during
the Ibadan conference, the North threatened to secede if not given half of the
seats in parliament. Again, after the counter coup in 1966, the North
threatened to secede until they were assured that power is now in their hands.
“Biafra is not an Igbo
thing; every Nigerian is a Biafran. The Biafra agitation is a cry against
injustice. Even geographically, Biafra is not an Igbo thing; it has never been
an Igbo thing.”
On its part, the pan-Yoruba
socio-cultural group, Afenifere, endorsed the demand for a referendum to
determine the future of the country.
Its National Publicity
Secretary, Yinka Odumakin, stated that a referendum was the right thing to do,
but chastised the northern youths for insisting on expelling the Igbo from the
North.
He said, “There is nothing
wrong with organising a referendum, there is no section in Nigeria today that
would not want a referendum on the future of Nigeria and that’s a civilised way
of doing things.
“In Quebec, Canada, how
many times have they organised referendum and now they even called it
liberendum. If they (northern youths) had called for this, nobody would be
against them, but to first say you are expelling the Igbo and now calling for
referendum, is an after-thought.”

No comments:
Post a Comment