Spain. According to the polls, 52 per cent of the people from that region wish to break off from Spain and to establish a new European sovereign state.
Later this year, the people of Scotland are having their own referendum to determine whether or not they will stay in the United Kingdom and,again, from the polls, it is very clear that the majority of Scots wish to have their own new sovereign state and that the Scottish Nationalist Party enjoys massive support.
Nobody in either Spain or the United Kingdom has insulted those people or labelled them as ''ethnic jingoists'' or ''primitive tribalists'' for wanting to break off from the greater whole and establish their own country.
This is because everyone respects the right of the various ethnic groups and nationalities within their wider nation to exercise their right of self-determination which is an integral and fundamental aspect of international law.
Exercising that right does not turn them into villains and does not make them any less patriotic than their compatriots who do not share their views.
It just means that they have a different perspective and that they believe, as many believed before Malaysia and Singapore broke up, that the interests of their various peoples are better served when and if they go their separate ways.
They opted to be friendly neighbours rather than to be compelled to remain within the same territory against their collective will.
As we in Nigeria approach the 100-year anniversary of our 1914 Lugardian amalglamation and, as the 2015 elections are fast approaching with both the northern region and the south-south zone desperate to take or to hold on to power at any cost respectively, we need to begin to ask ourselves some basic and fundamental questions about our future.
For example, is our interest better served by remaining as one nation or is it time for those nationalities that wish to leave the federation in a peaceful and orderly way, as a result of a legitimate and honest referendum, be alllowed to go?
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
If the breaking up of larger countries into smaller and more viable ones is good enough for India (which broke into three), the Sudan (which broke into two), Czekhoslovakia (which broke into two), Yugoslavia (which broke into 5), the Soviet Union (which broke into 15) and numerous other countries over the years, why is it not good enough for us?
Again, why should those that believe that Nigeria ought to break up be subjected to so much suspicion, ridicule, contempt and insults from those that do not share their views?
Some of the questions that need to be answered are as follows- firstly, is our union working? Secondly, is our marriage a good one and is it a happy one as well?
Are we satisfied with what has essentially become a country that has been turned into nothing more than (with apologies to Chief Bode George) ''Turn by Turn Nigeria?'' where each ethnic group simply looks forward to enjoying its time to control the federation and all the nation's resources from an all powerful centre? Are we not meant to be far more than this? Is this what the founding fathers of our nation envisaged?
More than anything else the recent igbo/yoruba debate over the issue of the status of Lagos state and the deportation of a handful of igbo destitute back to the east has proved to me that we as a people are very different from one another and that our interests may be better served if we are no longer bound together as one. I dare to voice this opinion even though many Yoruba share it but will not say so publiclly.
Is it not time for us to begin to accept the bitter truth that our marriage is uncomfortable and unhappy and that it may not have been made in heaven or ordained by God? Is it not clear that each region or each nationality ought to be able to develop at its own pace?
Is it not time for us to have a confederation of nationalities in Nigeria and to restructure the country drastically to give maximum autonomy to the various regions and nationalities or indeed is it not time to just break up and go our separate ways?
DIFFERENCES Many may disagree but one thing that I believe that we can at least agree on is that perhaps it is time for us to be courageous enough to begin to talk about these issues openly and debate them. We must not sweep our differences under the carpet and ignore them as if they do not exist but instead we must find the courage and muster the resolve to acknowledge them and understand them. As far as I am concerned, this is the challenge of our time and these are the questions that need to be answered.
Whatever happens in 2015 and whoever wins, whether it be a northerner or Goodluck Jonathan of the south-south, I see blood on the horizon and I see disaster approaching. Starkpromises from notable playerssuch as ''there will bebloodshedif Goodluck is not re-elected'' do not helpand are not encouraging.
There are equally strident and bellicosemurmurings from the other side as well and some havethreatened that if there is a repeat performance of the massiverigging that the North witnessed in the presidential election of2011 anywhere in the country in 2015,''Nigeria will burn''whilst another key player saidthat ''both the dog and the baboon shall be soaked in blood''.
2015 AS KEG OF GUN POWDER
These words must be taken very seriously indeed and they reflect the thinking and mindset of millions of people from both sides of the political and regionaldivide.
Worste still, whether we like to admit it or not, religion has now become a major factor in our politics with Christians being told in their churches that it is their solemn duty to support a Christian presidential candidateand Muslims being told in their mosques that it is theirs to support a Muslim. We are sitting on a keg of gunpowder and, in my view,2015 really will be the year of make or break for Nigeria. Sadly, in my humble opinion, it is far closer to ''break'' than it is to''make''.
If we wish to avoid the road to Kigali, we mustchangeour mindset and make the necessary concessions that we need to make. We must begin to think outside of the box and be far more innovative and adventurous. For example, why is it a must in the minds of somethatthe PDP must field aChristian as it's presidentialcandidate and why are some in the APC of the view thatthe partymust field a northern Muslim as its own?
These hard and fast fixed positionsare most unhelpfuland the right thing and proper thingto do is to completely discard them and attempt to find a presidential candidatethatis aNigerian before being anortherner, asoutherner, a Christian or aMuslim. And thankfullythere are quitea few of such people around in the new generationif only the system will be far-sighted and enlightened enough to allow them to emerge and run.
Failing thatwe must open up the space now and consider the unpleasant assertion that the premium that a united Nigeria attracts may not be worthpaying simplybecause we are getting nothing but failure after failure and sorrow after sorrowas our consistentreturn.
I do not have all the answers andneither do I claim that I do. Indeed I may well be wrong which is why I would be interested in hearing the views of others and particularly those from the younger generation who may see things very differently.
Whichever way it goes and regardless of what we all think, let us not allow this debate to be driven by the uninformed orignorance, pettiness, hateand acrimony. Let us not insult one another or act as if any tribe or nationality are a collection ofangels whilst others are nothing butdemons. Let us join issues and exchange ideas in a civil, restrained and decent manner without hurling insults at one another or allowing our emotions to becloud our thinking.
At the end of the day, we all want the same thing-namely,to put in place a system thatis in the best interest of the Nigerian people and to empower a newleadership that will allow them to achieve their full potentials? That is theobjective and that alone. Over to you.*Fani Kayode was a Minister of Aviation
Vanguard
No comments:
Post a Comment