Ms Giuffre alleges in a civil lawsuit that she suffered emotional harm and battery after being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and directed to have sex with Prince Andrew on three occasions in 2001.
Virginia
Giuffre’s attorneys have hit back at Prince Andrew for appearing to blame her
for abuse she suffered as a teenager, and say they look forward to
“confronting” him in court.
Prince
Andrew’s attorney Andrew Brettler demanded a “trial by jury” in a defiant
letter to Judge Lewis Kaplan over allegations he sexually assaulted Ms Giuffre
when she was 17-years old.
Andrew
denied all of Ms Giuffre’s claims in an 11-page letter to the court on
Wednesday, and asserted that Ms Giuffre’s own “wrongful conduct” would be a
central feature of his defence.
In a statement
to The Independent, Ms Giuffre’s attorney David Boies said: “Prince Andrew’s
answer continues his approach of denying any knowledge or information
concerning the claims against him, and purporting to blame the victim of the
abuse for somehow bringing it on herself.
“We look
forward to confronting Prince Andrew with his denials and attempts to blame Ms
Giuffre for her own abuse at his deposition and at trial.”
A trial is
now likely to take place in New York in September or October.
In a
letter to Judge Lewis Kaplan on Wednesday, Andrew’s attorney Andrew Brettler
set out a detailed response to Ms Giuffre’s allegations that she was trafficked
by the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and directed to have sex with the royal.
He denied
many allegations contained in Ms Giuffre’s complaint, elsewhere saying he
lacked “sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations”.
Andrew
also denies that he was “close friends” with Ghislaine Maxwell, who was
convicted last month of five counts of trafficking young girls for her “parter
in crime” Jeffrey Epstein.
Mr
Brettler sets out more than 10 “affirmative defences” in the letter, which
refer to evidence the royal will use to try to disprove the case.
Among them
is the so-called “doctrine of unclean hands”, which claims Ms Giuffre has acted
unethically.
No comments:
Post a Comment