Independent National Electoral Commission has said it may spend at least $7.9 on each of the 73.5 million electorate registered for the 2015 election.
The amount was estimated at N93bn when converted to naira
and multiplied by the numbers of registered voters.
The INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, stated this on
Monday at a stake holders forum organised by the Senate Committee on INEC, in
collaboration with the Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre, Abuja and the United
Kingdom Department for International Development.
He also hinted that the elections might be conducted either
in January or February 2015 instead of April.
Jega said, “Our estimate is that the cost of election per
voter, which is an international standard for viewing the cost of elections is
coming down in Nigeria. We project that for the 2015 elections, this would come
further down by almost $1 from $8.8 in 2011 to $7.9, representing almost a 10
per cent drop.
“This compares favourably with some other African countries.
However, we are anxious about all our funding requirements being met well in
advance of the 2015 general elections.”
He said that the $8 per voter spent by the country in the
2011 polls was normal.
According to Jega, Ghana during the last election spent
between $10 and $12 per voter while Kenya spent between $8 and $ 9 per voter.
He described funding as one of the challenges facing INEC as
it prepares for the 2015 elections that would see 73.5 million Nigerians
participating.
“In preparing for the forthcoming elections, one guiding
principle for the commission has been to make elections more cost-effective and
to give Nigerians better value for money,” the INEC chairman stated.
He noted that apart from funding challenges, there was the
problem of insecurity which could affect the conduct of elections in some
states in the North- East where insurgency was being currently experienced.
He said, “Unless security situation changes in the zone, the
commission would not conduct elections in there.
“It is my hope that the challenges in the North-East will be
resolved before 2015. If the security is such that we cannot do election, then
we may need to fall back on the law to suspend it or postpone it.”
Jega also said that INEC would not conduct elections under a
period of emergency.
He said, “The situation under a state of emergency is that
you cannot conduct a free and fair election. Ideally, you cannot conduct
election under a period of emergency.”
Jega added that one of the most depressing challenges of
elections in Nigeria was that they were akin to a war.
He said, “Pre-election violence has led to the death of many
politicians, their supporters and innocent citizens. Widespread intimidation of
voters persists and organised thugs spread fear across communities in the build
up to elections.
“In any case, elections in Nigeria are a winner-takes-all
affair, while the loser loses everything akin to payment of reparations by an
enemy defeated in a war. In fact, election security has become a lasting issue
facing the management of elections in Nigeria.
“Several security threats now characterise the electoral
process. These include physical attacks on INEC officials and facilities,
attacks on security personnel on election duty, misuse of security orderlies by
politicians, attacks on political opponent, cyber attacks targeting INEC’s
databases; especially the voter register and violence during electioneering.
Other threats are intimidation of voters, snatching and destruction of election
materials, among others.
“These threats are now exacerbated by insecurity in some
parts of the country, thereby making the conduct of elections in those parts
even more insecure.”
The INEC chairman added that the attitude of the political
class was also another problem giving the commission a major headache.
“We are concerned about this because even if the management
of elections meets the highest standards, insofar as the contestants are
unwilling to play by the rules, there will be grave problems,” he stated.
Jega said that apart from the key challenges, there were
what he described as residual problems like the delay in the amendment to the
1999 Constitution and Electoral Act; the completion of the review of electoral
constituencies and polling units and the prosecution of election offenders.
The INEC chief, who said that 200 electoral offenders had
been prosecuted, added that the establishment of a body to handle electoral
offences was imperative.
He said, “This remains a major sticking point in the work of
the commission. We have repeatedly noted that the commission lacks the capacity
to prosecute the huge number of offenders.
“We hope that our proposal for the establishment of an
independent body to deal with electoral offences which is also in the report of
the Election Reform Committee will materialise.”
The Chairman Senate Committee on INEC, Andy Ubah, said the
committee was interested in suggestions on how “we can address the issue of
Nigerians abroad who desire to contribute to the democratic development and
participate in elections.”
He also suggested the idea of introducing e-voting and
making adequate provisions for persons living with any form of disability to
vote.
Members of different political parties and civil society
organisations attended the stakeholders’ meeting
Bizzaire! in a country where people are starving
ReplyDeleteAnother means of stealing, thieves
ReplyDelete