The impeachment proceeding
notice is said to have been served on the governor and his deputy by the 19 All
Progressives Congress, APC, members who have been at loggerheads with the governor
since he came on board last October.
A Federal High Court
sitting in Abuja yesterday refused to halt the impeachment proceeding being
spearheaded by the 19 All Progressives Congress, APC, members of the Ekiti
State House of Assembly against Governor Ayodele Fayose, and his deputy, Kolapo
Olusola.
Although Fayose has been
working with only seven members of the PDP in the House, the APC lawmakers,
which the governor does not recognise, returned to the state this week with an
impeachment notice, prompting the closure of the House of Assembly by security
agents.
But the governor’s bid to
stop the impeachment through an interim injunction did not go through as the
court rejected their prayers contained in an ex parte application seeking
interim injunction to set aside the impeachment notice served on them and halt
further moves to remove them from office.
The court, however, granted
prayers contained in the ex parte application relating to service of the court
processes on the defendants.
Justice Ahmed Mohammed
ordered the defendants in the suit, including the APC factional Speaker of the
House of Assembly, Dr Adewale Omirin, and the Chief Judge of the state, Justice
Ayodeji Daramola, to appear in court on April 16.
The court ordered the
defendants to appear in court to show cause why the order of interim injunction
being sought by the plaintiffs halting the impeachment proceedings should not
be granted.
Other defendants in the
suit are, the Inspector General of Police, Mr. Suleiman Abba, and the Independent
National Electoral Commission.
The plaintiffs in the suit
are the Speaker of the House of Assembly (described as being occupied by the
Peoples Democratic Party factional Speaker, Dele Olugbemi); Ekiti State House
of Assembly, Fayose and Olusola.
Counsel for the plaintiffs,
Mr. Ahmed Raji, had sought the interim injunction halting the impeachment moves
through an ex parte application dated and filed on April 7, 2015.
He had urged the court to
grant the interim injunction setting aside the impeachment notice already
served on the governor and the deputy and also restraining the defendants from
taking any further steps in the impeachment moves.
The lawyer argued that the
act by Omirin to issue an impeachment notice and serve same on the governor and
the deputy governor as Speaker of the House of Assembly amounted to
impersonating the incumbent Speaker.

Fayose ur time is up
ReplyDelete