Not so long-ago Russia has once again ramped up the number of its long-range attacks, using Iranian-made suicide drones, and ballistic and cruise missiles on cities, such as the capital Kyiv, in the hope of depleting Ukraine’s stockpile of air-defence missiles.
As the
world awaits Ukraine’s expected counter-offensive, Ukrainian and Western
analysts have started suggesting the introduction of the weapon could force
Kyiv to make last-minute changes to its operational planning.
According
to report, flying over Ukraine’s north-east border, 10 of Russia’s most
advanced fighter jets were about to launch a weapon not yet seen in the war.
The 11
so-called glide bombs dropped on the night of March 24 confirmed reports that
the Russian air force is adapting after running low on cruise missiles and
failing to take control of the skies over Ukraine.
The
gliding bombs are fitted with "wings" to give them extra range, and
fly low and far enough to evade some radar-controlled air defences.
Russia’s
glide bombs grabbed the headlines when a fighter jet accidentally dropped a
bomb on the Russian frontier city of Belgorod, damaging buildings and injuring
at least three people.
Colonel
Yuriy Ihnat, the spokesman for Ukraine’s Air Force, told the Telegraph the
bombs posed a “very serious threat”.
The extra
range offered by the gliding technology means Russian jets can avoid risky
sorties near front lines to fire munitions.
“At the
moment the enemy is using tactical aviation for combat missions along the
border with Russia, the front line, and the sea coast. In all those regions the
enemy has for about a month been intensely using glide bombs,” Col Ihnat said.
It is
estimated by Ukrainian officials that Moscow’s forces are releasing at least 20
glide bombs per day on the battlefield.
The most
basic of glide bombs are modified weapons fitted with wings and navigational
systems that allow for a flight path to the target to be established.
It can be
as simple and crude as converting unguided weapons with the Russians mostly
overhauling old Soviet FAB-500 aerial bombs.
However,
some glide bombs, such as the UPAB‐1500B‐E, are specifically designed with
these features included.
It appears
that the winged bombs, which are cheaper and easier to produce than ballistic
and cruise missiles, have become Russia’s weapon of choice as it reportedly
runs out of more hi-tech precision munitions.
The specification and capabilities of each gliding weapon – modified or manufactured – differ drastically, with some reported to have operating ranges of up to 75 miles and able to hit a target within a 10-metre radius.
But most conventionally it is believed the glide bombs used by Russia have a range between 30 and 45 miles.
Regardless of the bombs’ efficiency, the weapon gives Russian fighter pilots the ability to use air power effectively to influence ground operations in a way they previously struggled to achieve.
Intelligence gathered by Ukraine shows that most glide bomb attacks are unleashed from 25-30 miles inside Russian territory, at which point the warplanes turn back to avoid coming into the range of Kyiv’s air-defences.
“The stand-off the new improvised weapons give means that the air defence threat that has previously constrained the use of strike and attack aircraft is somewhat mitigated,” Justin Crump, a military analyst at the intelligence consultancy Sibylline, told the Telegraph.
As Ukraine
transitions from its stocks of Soviet-era air defence systems, Kyiv finds
itself with only a small number of medium-to-long range systems to defend
against aerial attacks.
Most of
its short-range air defence systems are on the front line, while longer-range
missile systems are far behind the front to defend cities and keep them out of
range of Russian artillery and drone attacks.
“Why would
they use scarce ballistic cruise missiles of which they haven’t many left? It’s
a cheaper option. That’s why they are using glide bombs or S-300 surface to air
missiles to do that job,” Col Ihnat said of the glide bombs.
“The
S-300s we can sometimes intercept, but these bombs are a problem.”
No comments:
Post a Comment