A lawyer for Dr Conrad Murray argued in the 230-page brief that there was insufficient proof Jackson died of an overdose of an anaesthetic administered by Murray.
The
appeal, coming 18 months after Murray's conviction, also reiterated an
often-stated defence claim that Jackson may have administered the overdose to
himself.
The
pop superstar died on June 25, 2009, days before he was to leave for England to
perform in his ill-fated This is It concert.
Witnesses
said Murray had been giving him propofol as a sleep aid, a purpose for which it
was not intended.
Attorney
Valerie Wass said that because of Jackson's great fame, his doctor was used as
an example by the judge who sentenced him to the highest term for involuntary
manslaughter.
She
suggested that even if his conviction is upheld, his four-year sentence should
be reduced.
Murray
is eligible for release in October after serving half his sentence.
Murray's
two-month trial in 2011 drew wide media coverage, and Ms Wass argued that the
judge should have excluded TV cameras from the courtroom and granted a motion
to sequester jurors.
The
appeal said: "The unprecedented fame of the alleged victim combined with
the pervasiveness of modern media rendered it impossible for appellant to
receive a fair trial with a non-sequestered jury in a case that was televised
and streamed live around the world."
The
appeal also challenged the prosecution theory that Jackson was hooked up to an
IV drip of propofol and left alone in his bedroom by Murray.
It
called that scenario "absurd, improbable and unbelievable", and
provided an exhaustive reprise of scientific testimony about Jackson's death.
Murray
told police he gave the singer an extremely small dose of propofol, a fact
contradicted by scientists who reconstructed the events preceding the death.
The
appeal also faulted the judge for refusing to admit as evidence some of
Jackson's previous medical records, his contract with concert promoter AEG and
his financial documents.
The
attorney general's office, representing the prosecution, has 30 days to respond
to the appeal.
Meanwhile,
Murray may be summoned to testify in a civil lawsuit filed against AEG by
Jackson's mother.
Jury
selection in that case is currently underway. Katherine Jackson claims the
concert promoter was negligent in hiring Murray to care for the singer.
No comments:
Post a Comment