The elders had successfully impressed upon the Presidency to raise the Boko Haram committee to dialogue with the sect with a view to restoring elusive peace to the region. Jonathan, who met with the NEF leadership in Abuja in April, subsequently inaugurated the Turaki-led BH committee with a mandate to broker peace with the sect and compensates their victims within a two-month timeframe.
However, shortly after inaugurating the panel, the sect leadership rejected the amnesty offer, saying that it is the government that should seek amnesty for having killed its Muslim brothers across the country.
But a spokesman for the NEF, Prof Ango Abdullahi, who relayed the position of the group on Thursday, told a source that they were disappointed by the sudden change of tactic by Jonathan on how to resolve the crisis in the north.
They
also said the action had effectively ended the proposed amnesty for members of
the Boko Haram sect.
In
separate interviews with our correspondents, in Abuja, on Thursday,
Spokesperson of the Northern Elders Forum, Prof. Ango Abdullahi and Dr. Junaid
Mohammed described the President’s action as counter-productive.
Abdullahi
said, “The states have always been in a state of emergency in the states that
were announced the other day.
“The
states have always been occupied by soldiers anyway; I think this measure is
just a formality. From all indications, those areas that have been announced as
coming under the emergency, except Adamawa, Yobe and Borno, have always been
practically under the state of emergency.
“Our
own interpretation of the crisis and amnesty or reconciliation committee, the
surprise here is that the committee has not even been allowed to start serious
work before their undermining because you can’t have the two together.
“You
can’t have war while you are talking about peace and this is what we have on
the ground now. We have this war and dialogue; I don’t know which one will
succeed.”
ll;
According
to him, if allegations that members of the sect have taken over a part of Borno
State are true, it is a demonstration of the failure of the state.
He
said, “If it is true that this has happened it is the failure of the previous
military effort against their activities. It remains to be seen whether the
intensification of the military effort will succeed in an area where they
failed before.
“It
remains to be seen whether this is a good strategy but from all rational
analysis, it is ill timed, and ill-advised because if the President was
thinking of a state of emergency, he would have refrained from agreeing to set
up this amnesty or reconciliation committee and concentrate on the war effort.
“To
me, the work of the amnesty committee is practically terminated and we will
wait for the outcome of the war.”
He
explained that, “I cannot see how this will go together when you are more or
less pursuing the same people that you want to come forward to discuss with
you.”
Abdullahi
insisted that there was no military solution to the insurgency as such dialogue
remains the best option.
No comments:
Post a Comment