A
governorship aspirant of the All Progressives Congress, APC, in Lagos State,
Tola Kasali, 62, was on Tuesday, 11 November, 2014 arraigned for murder at the
Ebute-Meta Chief Magistrate’s Court in Lagos.
It was
gathered that all the accused were arraigned on four counts bordering on murder
and unlawful possession of firearms. The men conspired to kill one Musiliu
Lamidi on 9 November, 2014, around 2pm at Eko Tourism Hotel, Akodo, in the Ibeju-Lekki
area of the state, the police stated.
The police
added that they were found in possession of a pump-action gun, with number
6381, without a valid licence issued by the appropriate authorities. The corpse
of the deceased was said to have been found on the premises of one of the
defendants.
The offences
were said to be punishable under sections 231, 221 and 409 of the Criminal Law
of Lagos State, 2011 and Section 27 (b)(1) of the Firearms Act, Cap 28 Laws of
the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2011. Their
pleas were not taken by the court for the offences.
Meanwhile, a
senior state counsel, Femi Adamson, who came from the Office of the Attorney
General of the Federation, invoked a section of the law to take over
prosecution from the police.
“I am a
senior state counsel and I want to take over the prosecution of this case. This
is pursuant to Section 211 (1b), (2) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria, as amended,” Adamson said at the court.
The leader of
the police team from the legal department of the State Criminal Investigation
Department, Godwin Osuyi, said it was not right for the case to be taken from
the police since the police had only sought to remand the defendants in custody
pending legal advice.
“Before I
step aside, I wish to state that they were brought before this court for
remand. They have not been formally charged,” Osuyi said. Ruling on the matter, the court stated that
since the case belonged to the state, it could take charge of it at any time.
The state
prosecutor, Adamson, thereafter applied for the remand of the three defendants
in custody, citing Section 264(1) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law
of Lagos State, 2011.
However, the
leader of the seven-man defence team, Taiwo Ajala, opposed the application for
remand.
According to
Mr Ajala, there were no allegations before the court, but mere rumours, which
should be struck out. “So far, what are
before your honour are not charges, but mere rumours, which have no place in a
court of law. These rumours have been elevated to the point of allegations.
“To raise
rumours to allegations, one would have expected the prosecution to depose to an
oath so that the court can look into it. But this is missing.
“Accordingly,
I apply that the defendants be granted bail. Jurisprudentially, the reason
behind remand is if the court is not sure that the defendants will attend court
proceedings from time to time. “I crave
the indulgence of this court to the social standing and circumstances of the
defendants. The first is currently the special adviser to this government.
“The second
has a lot of prefixes to his name. He was a former Commissioner for Rural
Development. His impacts are felt on our roads. He was also a former Commissioner
for Special Duties, while the third defendant had, at different times been a
chief security officer of the state. They are all known by reputation,” Ajala
said.
Ajala said if
the defendants were not granted bail, it would affect the running of the government
and the residents of the state. After
making his submissions, the prosecutor said he was not objecting to bail.
“With all due
respect, bail is at the discretion of the court and the court is guided by
principles. I have come to realise that these are people serving the government
of the day in different capacities,” he said.
The Chief
Magistrate, Tunbosun Abolarinwa, in his ruling, expressed disappointment in the
prosecution for not being able to support the remand application brought before
the court. He said, “What is before the court is a remand application, but the
police who brought it have not been able to support same. This is probably why
the defence counsel referred to the charges as mere rumours.
“If their
movement is restrained, it will bring serious discomfort to them and people
associated with them and will be a disservice to the society. This court sees
them as people who should uphold the law of the land and the orders of this
honourable court. “This court has
confidence in their ability to show up in court. “The reasons for remand brought by the
prosecutions are not reliable and cannot sustain the charges.” Abolarinwa granted
the defendants bail on “self-recognition” and ordered the prosecution to verify
their addresses and places of work.
The matter
was adjourned till December 11, 2014 pending legal advice from the Directorate
of Public Prosecutions. The court was
filled with party loyalists, supporters and family members of the accused
persons, as many others stood outside the court.

No comments:
Post a Comment