Besides, Obasanjo also derided Jonathan’s administration for celebrating what he called “naked corruption”, which according to him, has hampered the nation’s economy and created problems for majority of Nigerians.
Obasanjo spoke at the
presentation of an autobiography of the former president of the Court of Appeal
and pioneer chairman of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related
Offences Commission (ICPC), retired Justice Mustapha Akanbi in Abuja.
The former President
claimed that “Boko Haram is not simply a menace based on religion or one
directed to frustrate anybody’s political ambition but essentially a
socio-economic problem that is tainted with religion.” He noted that apart from
not having a proper understanding of the phenomenon, the Jonathan
administration also wasted time in taking steps to curtail the malevolent
group. He maintained that “President Jonathan’s understanding of the Boko Haram
phenomenon suffered from wrong reading and wrong imputation; that is what led
us to where we are today”.
According to the former
president, “Boko Haram is essentially a socio-economic problem that is tainted
with religion. It is a gargantuan danger to the nation and to all Nigerians.
“It took even the President
more than three years to appreciate and understand that it is a terrible mix of
poor education or lack of education,
misinterpretation of what Islam and the Quran teach and stand for,
poverty unemployment, injustice, drug, gun trafficking, human trafficking,
fallout from Libya, revenge, frustration, struggle against inequality, imitation
of international terrorism leading to training and part absorption by
international terrorist group or groups and general poor governance including
corruption.
“I have always maintained
that solution to Boko Haram or any organization like it lies in application of
stick and carrot. We must remember that there is nexus between security and
development.
“Those who say that Boko
Haram is a menace waiting to happen are evidently correct. Some people have
blamed the governments of the zone at the state and local government levels for
the unacceptable socio-economic situation in the North-East. Of course, they
must accept part of the responsibility.
“But, I would rather say it
is a collective responsibility and, collectively, the situation must be
addressed and redressed. The beginning of redressing the situation is
education. I appreciated the importance of education in human development,
state and nation-building, national development, employment generation, wealth
creation, national unity, security and stability.
“When I had the opportunity
as both military Head of State and elected President, I paid particular
attention to education nationally through Universal Primary Education (UPE) as
military Head of State, and Universal Basic Education (UBE) as President.
“In the first case, it was
abandoned by the successor regime and in the second case, some states went to
the Supreme Court to secure order for the Federal Government not to participate
in basic education.
“It was claimed that
constitutionally, it is the preserve of states and local governments and some
of them did not live up to their responsibility.
“If we do not collectively
invest in primary education, how can we address the situation?
“The counterpart funding
instituted as a legitimate means of intervening by the Federal Government in
basic education turned out not to be adequately supervised by the successor
regime and became a veritable source of corruption at the state level and
between the Federal and the State officials.
“And yet, the cost of
primary education to the states has gone up with the policy of Nigeria
Certificate in Education (NCE) as minimum qualification for teachers in primary
schools. With that policy and closure of Teacher Training Colleges not
certified for NCE, there is great shortage of primary school teachers in many
parts of the country but particularly in the North.
“This is a situation that
cannot be rectified by states and local governments alone.
“I have never been against
application of force in dealing with insecurity situation, but we must
understand the genesis, the content and the context of each situation to
determine when, where, how and what quantum of force to apply and what amount
and type of carrot to feed in”.
He said further: “Let me
make bold to say that if we continue to apply force alone, since Boko Haram has
become an industry within the government circle and within Boko Haram itself,
it may be suppressed for a while but it will not be eliminated.
“To deal with the menace
root, stem and branches requires effective development programme for the zone
of incubation and existence of the menace.
“If not, that zone or any other zone like it
will be a fertile breeding ground for a similar menace in future or a rich
harvesting ground for recruiting candidates for mischief and perpetration of
insecurity internally and externally.
“Carrot must involve not
excluding negotiation at the appropriate time for ceasefire, laying down of
arms and peace-making terms and intervention with positive socio-economic
measures to deal with apparent root-causes of the conflict and violence.
“It would appear that this
understanding is beginning to be appreciated within the right circles. Better
late than never!
“Just as no country is guaranteed to be
permanently at peace, no country is destined to be permanently in conflict,
chaos and violence because of its societal divisions.
“It is all a matter of how
it is managed by governments and the institutions put in place to reduce,
placate, address and redress tensions and divisions and the flows from them.
“Timely intervention in
addition to early warning is both cost-effective and life-saving. We must not
define ourselves in simple stereotype of Western media and so-called experts,
who see us only through religious prisms. Those who do so, whether they are
politicians or religious leaders, are the enemies of this country.
“Boko Haram is a menace and
a dangerous one at that, but why must it be emphasized as an Islamic jihadist?
“Both words are unhelpful in the context of our own situation which requires
bi-partisan and collective national understanding of the issues at stake and
action to be taken.“ When they are described in such a way, it heightens the
division and tension within our own society. “A menace is a menace, a thief is
a thief, a terrorist is a terrorist; not a Christian thief or an Islamic thief.
No comments:
Post a Comment