In a letter addressed to the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Coca-Cola Company, Muhtar Kent, Mr Falana accused Coca-Cola of exhibiting double standard as it would not breach international standards in its operations in the United States or the United Kingdom as it does in Nigeria and threatens to seek redress in court if Coca-Cola persists in violating the fundamental right of Nigerians to health by supplying products which are injurious to their health.
Falana in his letter said:
“I have confirmed that the refusal to effectively comply with Nigerian laws and
regulations is selective on the part of your company because I am fully aware
that Coca-Cola will not set out to breach international standards in its
operations in the United States or the United Kingdom without serious
consequences and punishment by the appropriate authorities in both countries.“
In the circumstance, the
following questions are pertinent: Why has the Coca-Cola company engaged in
impunity in its operations in Nigeria? Why would the Coca-Cola Company expect
not to be held responsible in Nigeria when its products contain rusty bottle
crown corks, rusty cans and foreign particles? Are the health conditions of
Nigerians less important than those of Americans? Why would Coca-Cola Company
refuse to establish a Shelf Life Policy for their products in the country which
clearly would help to facilitate the removal of expired products from the
market?“
I contend that the double
standard clearly being exhibited by the Coca-Cola company in Nigeria is not
only unethical but also inconsistent with international best practices and
standards such as the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights:
Implementing the United Nations Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework. The
Guiding Principles were endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council in June 2011. “In
the light of the foregoing, I am compelled to urge Coca-Cola Company to ensure
consistency in its practice and operations whether in developed countries like
the United States and the United Kingdom or developing countries like Nigeria.
Coca-Cola should show a
greater level of responsibility by ensuring that its products are not harmful
to the Nigerian consumers and to allow the CPC and other authorities to carry
out their mandates in cases where Coca-Cola Company’s operations or services
are found to be directly or indirectly injurious to the health of Nigerians.“
Take notice that if the
Coca-Cola company continues to defy the authority of the Consumer Protection
Council and persists in violating the fundamental right of the Nigerian people
to health by supplying products which are injurious to their health we shall
not hesitate to apply to the appropriate High Court for redress which will
include the payment of exemplary and punitive damages and the suspension of the
operations of the Coca-cola company in Nigeria.
No comments:
Post a Comment