FIFA has voted to expand
the World Cup to 48 teams from its current 32, brushing aside concerns that the
expansion would lower the overall standard of the tournament, and make it too
long and unwieldy.
Teams participating in the
world cup have been increased and will no long be just 32 following a new
decision by FIFA.
Soccer's governing body
said on its Twitter feed that the FIFA Council, its decision-making panel, had
voted unanimously in favour of the change which will be introduced at the 2026
tournament.
The new format will include
a first round of 16 groups of three teams, FIFA said, with further details to
be given later.
FIFA president Gianni
Infantino, who replaced the disgraced Sepp Blatter in February, had made World
Cup expansion one of his promises during his successful electoral campaign.
Infantino had initially
suggested a 40-team tournament but then added another eight to that total in
October.
FIFA's 211 member
associations each hold one vote in the presidential election and 135 of them
have never played at a World Cup, so expansion of the tournament was always
likely to appeal.
Those who have never
qualified include 41 out of 54 of its African members and 10 out of 11 members
in the Oceania region.
Critics, including the
powerful European clubs as well as some leading coaches, have said that FIFA is
tampering with a winning formula.
The last World Cup in
Brazil was widely regarded as one of the best in the competition's 87-year-old
history, featuring shock results, last minute drama and outstanding individual
performances.
Another worry with the new
format is that there could be a number of matches at the end of the group stage
where both teams know exactly which result will send them into the next stage.
The qualifying competition,
meanwhile, is likely to become a mere formality for many of the strongest
teams.
The inaugural World Cup in
Uruguay featured just 13 teams and 17 matches. Sixteen teams took part from
1934, eight more were added from 1982 onwards and, finally, another eight in
1998.
-Reuters

No comments:
Post a Comment