A statement
by the Director of Information of the Federal Ministry of Information, Mr.
Salisu Na’Inna, in Abuja, yesterday, indicated that Ekiti had been warned about
the situation, as at August, last year, but that the warning was ignored.
Governor
Fayose told Vanguard, yesterday, that he was surprised to hear that the Finance
Minister actually denied stopping the disbursement to Ekiti because of failure
to meet the requirements.
Fayose said:
‘’She denied stopping our allocation because we failed to meet the requirement
at the Federal Executive Council meeting, yesterday (Wednesday).’’ However,
Na’Inna said: “The fact is that Ekiti
State government failed to comply with the necessary requirements for
participating in the Budget Support Facility, BSF, which is a Conditional Loan
Programme to state governments introduced, with the view to enhance fiscal
prudence and designed particularly to enhance transparency, efficiency in
public expenditure and payment of salaries.
“This is not
the first time of non-compliance by Ekiti State government. His administration
defaulted in meeting the conditions specified and agreed upon by the 35 state
governments that are participating in the programme as contained in the Fiscal
Sustainability Plan (FSP) and Ekiti State government was warned formally of its
failure to comply with the full requirements vide a letter on August 5, 2016,
with reference number HMF/FMF/ASG/1/2016.
“The failure
of Ekiti State government to comply with the requirements and conditions for
the Budget Support Facility, BSF, resulted in a letter sent to the Chief of
Staff to notify him of the suspension of BSF for Ekiti State and it was
conveyed to Mr President before payment to Ekiti State government was
reinstated. “Ekiti State government and all the other participating states are
aware of the consequence of failure to comply with the full conditions and it
is not the first time that a state would be stopped from accessing the facility
due to non-compliance.
‘’In the
course of its normal duties, the Ministry of Finance has the right to query,
suspend or withhold funds as part of the conditions of the Budget Support
Facility. “The process is for the Commissioner of Finance of any state or the
governor having issues to contact the Federal Ministry of Finance and resolve
the issues without resorting to the media because such issues are of a
financial nature and, therefore, confidential; they are routinely resolved
amicably by the parties involved.
“The Federal
Ministry of Finance wishes to restate very strongly that the Budget Support
Facility is a conditional programme and the federal government would not be
intimidated or threatened in the discharge of its duties.” When Vanguard asked
to know what specific conditions of the BSF Ekiti State failed to meet, an
official who insisted he must not be quoted, said the Resolution by the State
House of Assembly, authorizing it, which should be approved by the state
Executive Council, was never submitted by the state.
Another
official said the BSF was a loan that must be repaid, adding that each state
must meet the condition before it could benefit from it. Ekiti State government
in its reaction, described the explanation as an afterthought meant to mislead
the public. Special Assistant to the Governor on Public Communications and New
Media, Lere Olayinka, said the state signed for N14.4 billion and had received
funds monthly in the last seven months from the Ministry of Finance.
“So when
did they realise that Ekiti State did not meet the conditions? Or did they send
the allocations in the last seven months in error?” Olayinka queried. He also
argued that there was no warning letter or notification from the Ministry of
Finance before the governor raised the alarm, else there would have been no
need for the governor to write a letter to the ministry demanding explanations
on the non-release of the funds.
“If they sent
any letter, maybe they sent it today, because the governor was there yesterday
(Wednesday) and before then no one knew the reasons the funds were not
released. “As I am talking to you, we have not received any letter from the
ministry, if they sent any letter, maybe they sent it today.
This
explanation is an afterthought.” Olayinka also said he was aware that the funds
were earlier sent to the Central Bank of Nigeria along those of other states,
but was later recalled, with the name of Ekiti State removed from the list of
35 states. It’s an attempt by APC to
undermine Fayose’s govt— PDP Meanwhile, Ekiti State chapter of the Peoples
Democratic Party, PDP, has fingered the leadership of All Progressives
Congress, APC, in the alleged seizure of the January federation allocation to
Ekiti State.
The party
described the action as not only anti-people but also a deliberate attempt to
undermine Ayo Fayose’s government and make Ekiti ungovernable, ahead of the
2018 governorship election. The PDP said this much was evident in the statement
issued by Ekiti State APC which assumed the position of the spokesperson of
Federal Ministry of Finance, explaining the reason behind the action of the FG
as the time the Minister of Finance was assuring the state that the matter
would be looked into.
The All
Progressives Congress (APC) in Ekiti State had on Wednesday, said there was no
truth in the claim of Governor Fayose that the federal government had withheld
the state monthly allocation, saying what was withheld was the special funds
approved by the Federal Government for budget support intervention in states.
The APC
accused Governor Ayodele Fayose of lying and instigating Ekiti people against
President Muhammadu Buhari and APC-led Federal Government and for blaming the
federal government for his inability to pay workers. In a statement by the
State Publicity Secretary, Mr Jackson Adebayo, in Ado-Ekiti yesterday, PDP
added that APC had ignorantly exposed itself with the statement, to the extent
that the whole world would not need any other explanation than to conclude that
Nigeria had become a despotic state where fascism now thrived. Adebayo
maintained that the APC-led Federal Government had become a party of woe that
would not care about the welfare of the people it governed.

No comments:
Post a Comment