Specialised Tasks,
Training, Equipment and Protection International (STTEP), a South African mercenary
company, has revealed that the Nigerian government rejected intelligence
warnings about the operations of Boko Haram in Borno state.
STTEP was employed by
former president Goodluck Jonathan in January 2015 to assist the Nigerian army
in the war against the insurgents.
In a Facebook post on
Sunday, Eeben Barlow, STTEP chairman, speaking out in the wake of the deadly
killing of Nigerian soldiers by Boko Haram insurgents, said Nigerian soldiers
have been reaching out for help since his company’s services were terminated.
Barlow said present
administration did not allow his company complete the objective of “degrading
and destroying” Boko Haram in Borno.
He wrote: “There is, in a
purely military sense, no such thing as a ‘technical defeat’—something the
President, as an ex-military man ought to know. Sadly, he also chose to make
the successes of 7 Infantry Division and 72 Mobile Strike Force (MSF) his own,
when it wasn’t.
“President Buhari and his
team were, however, part of the political leader group that led the vocal
charge about STTEP’s presence in Nigeria. Indeed, they made it known that the
company’s presence would not be tolerated under his office.
“The initial 3-phase
campaign strategy (known as ‘Operational Anvil’) to degrade and destroy BH in
Borno State, was rejected by his advisors.
“Many of the men we trained
as part of 72 Mobile Strike Force have remained in contact with us (STTEP),
pleading for our return to Nigeria. They have also told us that they have been
used to a point of exhaustion.
“Prior to, and following
our departure from Nigeria, we issued numerous intelligence warnings to his
government. These intelligence warnings were all rejected in favour of a false
belief.
“Neighbouring countries
were advised not to listen to us as it was claimed to be a cheap attempt to
‘get a contract’. Chad, Cameroon and Niger are now also reaping the benefits of
rejecting intelligence in favour of an agenda-driven narrative.”
No comments:
Post a Comment