Friday 20 December 2019

Henry Okah Lost Yet Another Court Bid For Freedom

Image result for Henry Okah Lost Yet Another Court Bid For FreedomImage result for Henry Okah Lost Yet Another Court Bid For Freedom
Mvundla told Okah that the apex court only allowed direct access to it in exceptional circumstances.
Henry Okah, convicted leader of Movement for the Emancipation of Niger Delta(MEND) was undaunted after he lost yet another court bid for freedom today in Pretoria, South Africa.
He vowed to take the case to the Constitutional Court.

But he was immediately warned by Gauteng High Court, Pretoria judge Moses Mavundla that his next line of action has a scant chance of success.
The judge told Okah that if he wanted to launch a leave to appeal application against the judgment in the high court, he was welcome to do so in January.

But Okah, who was heavily guarded by armed correctional services officers, said he will “100%” turn to the Constitutional Court.

In asking the court earlier this month to declare his conviction on terrorist related charges unlawful and to ultimately set him free, he told the judge: “I am not a terrorist. I am a prisoner of war.”

Okah, who conducted his own case, not only lost his application, but he was slapped with the hefty legal bill, which included three advocates – one of which is a senior advocate – on Government’s side.

He is serving a 24 year prison term after he was convicted in 2013 on several terrorist related charges. It followed the bombings in the Nigerian cities of Warri and Abuja in March and October 2010.
Twelve people were killed during the bombing in Abuja and 36 were injured, while one person was killed and 11 seriously injured in Warri.

He was arrested in South Africa, where he also planned one of the bombings.

His application for the court to declare that he was a participant in a non-international armed conflict and thus protected by the Geneva Convention, was refused by Judge Mavundla.

Okah earlier argued that he is entitled to appear before a tribunal as contemplated by the Convention and that he should have never been tried by a criminal court in this country.

He argued that his rights to a fair trial were violated as he was prosecuted under the wrong statute.

“If you argue that anyone who fights against his government is a terrorist, everyone who fought for liberation in South Africa would then be a terrorist,” he said.

He said he was merely embroiled in an armed conflict against the Nigerian government and said the people who died and were injured during the two bombings, were mainly members of the Nigerian security forces.

Following his conviction, Okah turned to the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein, which overturned his convictions regarding the Warri bombings. His sentence was reduced to 20 years imprisonment, but following an appeal to the Constitutional Court by the prosecution, that court reinstated the convictions and 24 year sentence.

It also dismissed Okah’s cross appeal that he should have been dealt with under the Rome Statute.

Two more appeals by Okah to the high court and the SCA on technical points also failed.
Judge Mavundla said Okah had exhausted his appeal rights as his applications were dismissed by various courts.

“An accused and sentenced person cannot be allowed to seek to have a second bite of the cherry, by seeking to have his conviction and sentence set aside after he had already exhausted his appeal rights…”

Okah is being kept at Pretoria’s C-Max Prison as he is regarded as a high risk prisoner. He was brought here earlier from the maximum security prison in Kokstad in light of this application.

No comments:

Post a Comment