A statement
from the EFCC says Ugwuanna had approached the appellate court for reprieve,
but got additional jail term, as the court held that the trial court did not
have the discretion to prescribe the five year jail term it sentenced the
convict for an offence the law stipulates seven years jail term on conviction,
hence it reviewed the sentence upward.
Ugwunna’s
ordeal started on March 31, 2014 when the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission, EFCC South-East Zone arraigned him on six-count charges, bordering
on forgery and obtaining by false pretence, contrary to Sections 1(1) (a) of
the Advance Fee Fraud and other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006 and Section
443 (1) of the Criminal Code Law of Anambra State.
Investigations
established that the convict sometime in 2011, fraudulently presented himself
as a representative of a Chinese company that deals in vehicle spare parts,
upon which he obtained the sum of N12.4million from his victim to make supplies
to him.
Without
making the supplies, he diverted the money to his personal use, and frustrated
all efforts by his victim to recover his money.
To further
cover up his fraudulent act, he forged some sales confirmation receipts,
purported to have emanated from Guangzhou Zwei Import and Export Co. Ltd, a
Chinese company with branch office in Lagos, which he claimed he represented.
In the course
of investigations, he jumped the administrative bail granted him by the
Commission and absconded to Niger State, were he hibernated for more than a
year before he was arrested by the police and handed over to the Enugu Zonal
Office of the EFCC.
Counsel for
the EFCC, Mainforce Adaka Ekwu, invited five witnesses and tendered several
exhibits to prove the case against him before the adoption of final written
addresses.
Justice
Nwankwor of the trial court found him guilty of counts four, five and six of
the charges which contravened Sections 1(1) (a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and
other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006 and Section 443 (1) of the Criminal Code
Law of Anambra State and jailed him five years, without option of fine,
prompting him to approach the Court of Appeal for a reprieve that earned him
additional two years.” the statement read
No comments:
Post a Comment